There are further indicators that the DCA 'consultation process' is a smokes screen to provide an alibi for the dearly, in announcing the new Disclosure Rules.

There has been great fanfare and much stage like deliberations.  We have been informed, concerning the changes to introduce ' transparency and openness' into Family Court proceedings, because it is just not 'tenable''.  It is 'indefensible' so said the senior judges and officials in the DCA

These new Disclosure Rules, were meant to be announced in April 2006.

April was postponed to July.

Then in July 2006 there were no new Disclosure Rules but 'proposals' and a consultative document.  Do pardon me as I yawn!

Now the smoke and mirrors trick has been pushed back to an unknown date?

We know the consultative period ends on 30 October 2006.  So all of you scribblers who take this seriously, get felled in and writing.  It is not likely that a conclusion will be reached before April 2007.  With one more delay to July 2007 and a further 'consultative document'.  My! This could go on until this government party of ex-social workers and its sexual predator Deputy Prime Minister have been chucked out of office and we are sending one or two of them food parcels in prison!

Even if new Disclosure Rules are issued as an amendment to the Act in April 2007, the bald facts are that they couldn't possibly allow the press in to report on the same basis as the media reports from the criminal courts.  The corruption would become evident within the first week.  So the new Disclosure Rules will be limited to the press disclosing :

1.   The Final judgement.

OR

2.  The Final judgement and sanitized extracts that will not identify the social workers, pediatricians, psychiatrists, psychologists, whose evidence has instigated the cases.

So what's different from the charade that is operated in the gulag of the Family Court till now ?

As if to make my case, I have been informed that the Community Care Magazine is conducting a poll on:

" Should social workers giving evidence in family court proceedings be granted anonymity? "

Surprise! Surprise !..... 60% ........say, " YES " .   I bet you are surprised!

I have also been informed that the British Association for Social Workers ( BASW ), in stating its position in the current issue, has warned, that social workers will be singled out for retribution if they are named in media reports.  Ah! Diddems! Has no one ever told these people that this is supposedly a 'justice system'.  This gulag is run worse than a card school!

So social workers wish to accuse ordinary members of the public in a secret court, have their reports kept secret, keep their own identity secret, and have a decision to take children away from their parents, give the children to their connections in adoption agencies ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITY !

This is villainy personified!.  They want to continue to keep their identities from being disclosed, because of the serial nature of some of their crimes and to avoid prosecution.

Keep any eye on this and follow the DCA carefully.  I believe that Harriet Harman has been mugged by her civil servants and court officials. No doubt, the myriad of ex-social workers strategically placed in Parliament, government agencies, quangos and charities have been working overtime to conceal their activities.  They know that once the press go into the gulag of the Family Court the gravy train of unscrutinized public funding, that has been utilized to falsely accuse innocent members of the public and vulnerable parents and children, to achieve 'targets', to obtain bonuses for 'achieving targets', to achieve promotion on the back of this corruption, will be exposed.

The gulag will be fighting hard to ensure its secrets are not disclosed.  You have been WARNED!